JOVANA
Explore Library Glossary Getting Started Three Levels Fields How it works Mission
Join the mission
Back to the library
大气化学 1974

氟氯烃在平流层的归宿

马里奥·J·莫利纳 与 F. 舍伍德·罗兰

惰性的人造气体悄悄升空,啃食着那层为生命挡住太阳的臭氧。

Choose your version
In depth · the introduction

你祖父母那些喷雾罐里的气体,无害到地球上没有任何东西能毁掉它们——而这,恰恰就是危险所在。

核心想法

在我们高高的头顶,有一层薄薄的臭氧——一种氧的形态,它在太阳最具破坏力的紫外线抵达地面之前,就把它们吸收掉。没有它,几分钟就会晒伤,陆地上的生命也将岌岌可危。莫利纳与罗兰发现,一类看不见的人造气体,正悄悄地把这面盾牌啃食殆尽。

罪魁是氟氯碳化物——CFCs——那些用在冰箱、空调和喷雾罐里、又安全又便宜的化学品。它们极不活泼,低层大气中没有任何东西能把它们分解,于是它们缓缓飘上平流层。在那里,阳光终于把它们裂开,释放出氯原子——而单单一个氯原子,便能接二连三地摧毁约十万个臭氧分子,因为那套化学,每一次都把氯原子原封不动地交还回来。

它是如何诞生的

1973 年,年轻的墨西哥化学家马里奥·莫利纳,加入了加州大学尔湾分校舍伍德·罗兰的实验室,接手了一个看似平静的问题:氟氯烃最终去了哪里?一步步追踪那套化学,两人惊觉答案竟是臭氧层,而那损害可能极其巨大。他们于 1974 年在《自然》上发表了这一警告——随后做了一件化学家不常做的事:他们诉诸公众,呼吁禁用这些利润丰厚的产品。工业界为此强硬反击了多年。昭雪来得缓慢,却又骤然——随着 1985 年南极臭氧空洞的发现;1995 年,莫利纳、罗兰与保罗·克鲁岑分享了诺贝尔化学奖。

它为何重要

这是科学第一次在一场全球性的环境灾难还仅仅是一个预测时,就把它逮住——而世界及时行动了。1987 年的《蒙特利尔议定书》在全球范围内淘汰了氟氯烃,臭氧层如今正在缓缓痊愈。它矗立在那里,成为那个伟大的证明:人类能够预见一场行星尺度的威胁,并选择携手将它挡下。此后每一场关于保护大气的争论,都倚靠着这个先例。

一个可以想象的画面

想象一个破坏者,手握一把万能钥匙,能打开任何锁、把锁弄断,随后又好端端地回到你手里——只待去开下一把锁。你不会用钥匙有多少来衡量威胁;一把就足以弄坏成千上万把锁。一个氯原子,就是那把钥匙,臭氧分子就是那些锁,而「催化剂」,正是「一把永不磨损的钥匙」的名字。在下面的工具里,运行这个循环,看单单一个氯原子积起一笔巨大的账,而它自己的数目,从不超过一。

一幅循环示意图:氯(Cl)与一氧化氯(ClO)由两个反应步骤连起,它们摧毁臭氧,再把氯交还。一个滑块推进一个氯原子绕行的次数;一个大计数器显示被摧毁的臭氧攀向十万,而氯原子数始终是一。

它的位置

催化的想法属于保罗·克鲁岑,他在 1970 年最先证明氮氧化物会啃食臭氧;莫利纳与罗兰,则把它对准了人造的氟氯烃。它属于这样一段故事:我们如何学会把整个大气当作一个化学系统来解读——与本馆阿伦尼乌斯 1896 年关于二氧化碳与变暖的工作、以及基林的二氧化碳测量并肩而立。而它至今仍是气候问题那充满希望的对照面:那一次,我们找到了危险,叫出了它的名字,并把它修好了。

The original document
Original source text
M. J. Molina and F. S. Rowland · Nature 249, 810–812 · 28 June 1974
The puzzle of a perfectly stable gas
The chlorofluoromethanes — CFCl₃ and CF₂Cl₂, the workhorse refrigerants, aerosol propellants and solvents of mid-century industry — are prized precisely because they are inert: non-flammable, non-toxic, and unreactive with almost everything at ground level. That virtue is the problem. With no chemical or biological process to remove them, they simply accumulate, and the paper asks the question no one had: if nothing destroys these gases near the surface, where do they finally go?
The only sink: photolysis far overhead
The answer is that they go up. Over years to decades the molecules diffuse into the stratosphere, and only there — above most of the protective ozone, bathed in short-wave ultraviolet that never reaches the ground — are they at last broken apart, releasing free chlorine atoms. The unreactivity that let them survive the troposphere delivers their chlorine intact to the one altitude where it can do the most harm.
The catalytic chain
A chlorine atom then attacks ozone in a two-step chain — Cl + O₃ → ClO + O₂, then ClO + O → Cl + O₂ — whose net effect is O₃ + O → 2 O₂. Crucially the chlorine is handed back at the end of each lap: it is a catalyst, not a reactant consumed. A single atom can therefore run the cycle on the order of a hundred thousand times, destroying ~10⁵ ozone molecules, before it is eventually parked in a longer-lived reservoir such as HCl. The conclusion is stark: continued release of these gases must thin the ozone layer.
What the paper warned — and what it could not yet know
[ … ]
The chemistry was new but not unprecedented: Crutzen (1970) had shown an analogous catalytic destruction of ozone by nitrogen oxides, and Stolarski and Cicerone, the same year, proposed chlorine catalysis from other sources. Molina and Rowland's leap was to name a vast, fast-growing, wholly man-made source — the CFCs — and to follow it to its consequence. The paper could not foresee the speed of what came: the Antarctic ‘ozone hole’ found in 1985 was far deeper than these gas-phase estimates implied, driven by extra reactions on the surfaces of polar stratospheric clouds. The full kinetics and the policy response are downstream of these two pages.
Department of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine · 1974