JOVANA
Library Glossary Getting Started Three Levels Fields How it works Mission
Join the mission
Back to the library
化学 1956

《涉及电子转移的氧化还原反应理论》

鲁道夫·马库斯

电子要跳之前,溶剂得先重新排布——这决定了反应有多快。

Choose your version
In depth · the introduction

让一个反应更有利,它通常会更快。可马库斯发现了那个奇怪的例外——而一整套关于电子如何移动的理论,就藏在里面。

把这个想法拆开看

化学里有一大类反应,归根到底,就是一个电子从一个分子或离子,跳到另一个上——电池、生锈、呼吸,以及光合作用的最初一步,核心都是它。鲁道夫·马库斯问了一个看似简单的问题:是什么,决定了这一跳的快慢?

他的答案是:电子要等周围准备好了,才肯跳。水里的一个离子,被一层溶剂分子裹着,那些分子是按它此刻的电荷排布好的。电子一动,这套排布就忽然不对了。于是什么也不会发生,直到寻常的热运动,偶然把溶剂——连同分子自己的键——拧成一个对「之前」和「之后」都同样合适的形状。电子这才滑过去,不耗能量。要够到那个中间形状所需的功——重组能——加上反应有多「下坡」,就定下了快慢。

它从哪里来

1950 年代初,在布鲁克林理工学院,马库斯正困惑于:为什么溶液里有些电子交换反应快如闪电,有些却慢吞吞,而每一例里,都没有一根化学键被生成或打断。当时主流的反应速率理论,是为重排原子的反应而造的,根本用不上。在 1956 年《化学物理杂志》的一篇论文里——那是一长串名篇的头一篇——他顺着「周围的溶剂必须做什么」,找到了那张缺失的图。

这套理论给出一个预言,奇怪到许多化学家拒绝相信:过了某一点,让反应更有利,反而会让它更慢。直到 1984 年,才有实验当场抓到这个「反转区」。又过八年,1992 年,马库斯获得诺贝尔化学奖。

它为何重要

电子转移的速率,第一次能被计算,而不只是被测量——从两个可理解的量算出。同一条方程,对一枚生锈的铁钉、一个氧化还原酶、一个电池电极、一块太阳能电池,都同样管用。而反转区,结果竟是有用而非只是稀奇:它正是为什么光合作用——以及设计良好的太阳能电池——里那个电荷分离态,能撑得够久去做功,而不是立刻塌回去。

一个日常的类比

把它想成体育场里坐满的人,全都朝一侧倾身看台上的戏。要把戏挪到另一侧(把电子转移过去),观众得先把身子调到两边都不偏的中间——一个别扭、费劲的过渡。只有从那个平衡的一刻起,戏才能跳过去,谁都不必猛地一晃。妙处在于:要是另一侧精彩得多(驱动力很大),你或许以为会立刻切换——可要够到那个平衡的倾身,其实更费劲,于是变化反而可能更慢。拖动下方的控件,看那道势垒缩小、消失,再重新长大。

上方:两条抛物线——反应物为灰色,产物为彩色——相交于一点,交点的高度就是能量势垒;产物曲线下移时,交点先降到基线,随后又重新爬升。下方:电子转移速率随驱动力变化的曲线,先升到峰值再回落——这就是马库斯反转区。

它在知识谱系里的位置

马库斯的理论,补全了过渡态理论(艾林,1935)开启的故事——后者解释了重排原子的反应速率,却管不了光秃秃的电子一跳。它借用了来自光谱学的弗兰克—康登思想:电子比原子核动得快得多;它一头连着化学键的量子化学(鲍林),另一头连着生命的氧化还原机器。休什得到了密切相关的结果,列维奇与多戈纳泽则给出了量子版本。

The original document
Original source text
R. A. Marcus · J. Chem. Phys. 24(5), 966–978 · May 1956 · Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn
The problem
A large class of reactions in solution does nothing but pass an electron between two species — the exchange Fe²⁺ + Fe³⁺ → Fe³⁺ + Fe²⁺ is the type case — with no bonds made or broken. Transition-state theory, built for reactions that rearrange atoms along a single coordinate, gave no handle on them: why is one such electron exchange fast and another slow, when chemically nothing seems to happen?
A mechanism for electron transfer reactions is described, in which there is very little spatial overlap of the electronic orbitals of the two reacting molecules in the activated complex.
The slight-overlap mechanism
Because the electronic coupling is weak, the electron cannot simply hop whenever the partners collide: the solvent, polarized around the old charge distribution, would be left out of equilibrium with the new one, and energy would not be conserved (the Franck–Condon principle, applied to the nuclei). Marcus required instead that thermal fluctuations of the solvent polarization — and of the reactants' own bond lengths — first carry the system to a nuclear configuration in which the reactant and product electronic states have equal energy. Only there can the electron move at constant energy; the solvent then relaxes about the new charges.
Two parabolas and the reorganization energy
Treating the solvent as a dielectric continuum, Marcus showed that the free energy of the reactant state and of the product state are each, to a good approximation, a parabola in a collective reaction coordinate measuring the nonequilibrium polarization. The reaction proceeds through their intersection. The height of that intersection — the activation free energy — is fixed by just two quantities: the driving force ΔG° and the reorganization energy λ, the energy it would take to distort the reactants' nuclei and surrounding solvent into the products' equilibrium arrangement without moving the electron.
The result is compact — ΔG‡ = (λ + ΔG°)² / 4λ — and for the solvent contribution Marcus gave λ as a continuum expression in the reactant radii, their separation, and the optical and static dielectric constants of the medium.
[ … ]
The inverted region
The formula carries a startling consequence. As the reaction is made more favourable (−ΔG° rising from zero) the barrier falls — until, at −ΔG° = λ, it vanishes and the rate is greatest. Push further and the barrier returns: the rate now decreases as the driving force grows. This 'inverted region' was thought so implausible that it was doubted for some twenty-five years, until rigid donor–acceptor molecules confirmed it in 1984.
What followed
This was the first of a celebrated series running through the 1950s and 1960s, in which Marcus added the cross-relation linking a reaction's rate to its self-exchange rates. N. S. Hush reached closely related results; Levich and Dogonadze recast the theory quantum-mechanically; the experimental foundation came from Taube, Sutin, and others. The work brought Marcus the 1992 Nobel Prize in Chemistry.
Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn · 1956