JOVANA
Library Glossary Getting Started Three Levels Fields How it works Mission
Join the mission
Back to the library
遗传学 1941

脉孢菌中生化反应的遗传控制

乔治·W·比德尔 · 爱德华·L·塔特姆

一个基因,造出一种酶,掌管生命化学中的一步。

Choose your version
In depth · the introduction

两位科学家,故意把一种不起眼的面包霉菌弄坏——而就在它损坏的碎片里,找到了基因与生命化学之间的那条链环。

核心想法

一个生命体,是靠成千上万个微小的化学步骤把自己搭起来的,而每一步,都由一台特别的蛋白质机器——叫做「酶」——来运转。比德尔与塔特姆证明:每一种酶,都是按照某一个基因的指令造出来的。

所以,打断一个基因,你就失去一种酶,于是某一步化学反应就停了。基因→酶→反应,正是这条简单的链环,被他们证明了出来。

它从哪里来

1941 年,在斯坦福,乔治·比德尔与爱德华·塔特姆挑中了面包霉菌脉孢菌,因为它平时几乎能从无到有,造出自己所需的全部维生素和原料。这让它成了完美的实验对象:任何一样它「不再造得出来」的东西,都会立刻显眼。

他们用 X 射线轰它,制造随机突变,再去搜寻那些丢了「造某一种特定营养物」之能力的霉菌。每找到一个,背后总是一个被损坏的单基因。把这一招一次次重复下去,你就把生命的化学,映射到了运转它的那些基因之上。

它为何重要

在此之前,「基因」是一个抽象的遗传单位——一样从亲代传给子代的东西,可没人知道它究竟在「做」什么。这个实验,给出了一个具体的化学答案:一个基因,造一种酶。它把基因变成了你能用化学去探问的东西,并奠定了一整门学科——生化遗传学。

一个类比

想象一条工厂流水线,每个工位由一名工人负责、只装一个零件。如果某个工人(也就是酶)没来上班,流水线就在那个工位卡住,半成品在它后面越堆越多。你只要看流水线在哪儿停下,就知道是哪名工人缺席了——而你只要从缺口之后的工位递一个零件进去,就能让它继续动起来。那些损坏的霉菌,正是这样被救活的:喂它一样断点之后的原料,它就又长起来了。

一条由三个酶箭头连起四个方框的通路;按钮可以打断一个基因(一个箭头)或往培养基里加一种原料,唯有当所加原料处在断开箭头之上或之后时,霉菌才生长。

它落在哪里

它建立在孟德尔那抽象的遗传单位之上(见孟德尔,1866),并给了它们一份「活儿」去干。它笔直地指向分子时代:一旦 DNA 被证明是遗传物质(见埃弗里,1944)、其结构被找到(见沃森–克里克,1953),克里克便终于能说出,一个基因的序列是如何变成一种酶的(见克里克,1958)。而「基因掌管化学」的细菌版本,是莫诺与雅各布关于基因如何开关的发现(见莫诺与雅各布,1961)。比德尔与塔特姆因这项工作,分享了 1958 年的诺贝尔奖。

The original document
Original source text
G. W. Beadle & E. L. Tatum · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 27 (1941), 499–506 · communicated October 8, 1941
The premise
Beadle and Tatum begin from a simple idea of physiological genetics: that the life of an organism is an integrated web of chemical reactions, and that these reactions are controlled, step by step, by genes. If that is true, then damaging a single gene should disable a single chemical step — a prediction that ought to be testable.
The method — mutants that can no longer feed themselves
They chose the bread mould Neurospora, which normally grows on a 'minimal' medium of sugar, salts, and one vitamin (biotin), making everything else it needs by itself. Spores were exposed to X-rays to induce random mutations; survivors were grown on a rich 'complete' medium and then tested on the minimal medium. A strain that thrived on complete medium but failed on minimal had lost some ability to synthesise a nutrient — and adding back single vitamins or amino acids, one at a time, revealed exactly which one.
What they found
Their first confirmed mutants had each lost the power to make a specific compound — among them vitamin B6, vitamin B1, and p-aminobenzoic acid — and in every case the new requirement was inherited as a single Mendelian gene. A gene, they concluded, governs a particular chemical reaction; mutate the gene and that one reaction fails.
[ … ]
The hypothesis it became
This paper does not use the slogan, but the principle drawn from it became famous as 'one gene–one enzyme': each gene specifies one enzyme that catalyses one step of metabolism. Applied to a whole pathway, the same logic even orders its steps — a mutant is rescued only by intermediates lying at or beyond its block, so the pattern of rescues reads out the sequence of the chemistry.
Stanford University, California · 1941