JOVANA
Library Glossary Getting Started Three Levels Fields How it works Mission
Join the mission
Back to the library
化學 1956

《涉及電子轉移的氧化還原反應理論》

魯道夫·馬庫斯

電子要跳之前,溶劑得先重新排布——這決定了反應有多快。

Choose your version
In depth · the introduction

讓一個反應更有利,它通常會更快。可馬庫斯發現了那個奇怪的例外——而一整套關於電子如何移動的理論,就藏在裡面。

把這個想法拆開看

化學裡有一大類反應,歸根到底,就是一個電子從一個分子或離子,跳到另一個上——電池、生鏽、呼吸,以及光合作用的最初一步,核心都是它。魯道夫·馬庫斯問了一個看似簡單的問題:是什麼,決定了這一跳的快慢?

他的答案是:電子要等周圍準備好了,才肯跳。水裡的一個離子,被一層溶劑分子裹著,那些分子是按它此刻的電荷排布好的。電子一動,這套排布就忽然不對了。於是什麼也不會發生,直到尋常的熱運動,偶然把溶劑——連同分子自己的鍵——擰成一個對「之前」和「之後」都同樣合適的形狀。電子這才滑過去,不耗能量。要夠到那個中間形狀所需的功——重組能——加上反應有多「下坡」,就定下了快慢。

它從哪裡來

1950 年代初,在布魯克林理工學院,馬庫斯正困惑於:為什麼溶液裡有些電子交換反應快如閃電,有些卻慢吞吞,而每一例裡,都沒有一根化學鍵被生成或打斷。當時主流的反應速率理論,是為重排原子的反應而造的,根本用不上。在 1956 年《化學物理雜誌》的一篇論文裡——那是一長串名篇的頭一篇——他順著「周圍的溶劑必須做什麼」,找到了那張缺失的圖。

這套理論給出一個預言,奇怪到許多化學家拒絕相信:過了某一點,讓反應更有利,反而會讓它更慢。直到 1984 年,才有實驗當場抓到這個「反轉區」。又過八年,1992 年,馬庫斯獲得諾貝爾化學獎。

它為何重要

電子轉移的速率,第一次能被計算,而不只是被測量——從兩個可理解的量算出。同一條方程,對一枚生鏽的鐵釘、一個氧化還原酶、一個電池電極、一塊太陽能電池,都同樣管用。而反轉區,結果竟是有用而非只是稀奇:它正是為什麼光合作用——以及設計良好的太陽能電池——裡那個電荷分離態,能撐得夠久去做功,而不是立刻塌回去。

一個日常的類比

把它想成體育場裡坐滿的人,全都朝一側傾身看臺上的戲。要把戲挪到另一側(把電子轉移過去),觀眾得先把身子調到兩邊都不偏的中間——一個彆扭、費勁的過渡。只有從那個平衡的一刻起,戲才能跳過去,誰都不必猛地一晃。妙處在於:要是另一側精彩得多(驅動力很大),你或許以為會立刻切換——可要夠到那個平衡的傾身,其實更費勁,於是變化反而可能更慢。拖動下方的控件,看那道位壘縮小、消失,再重新長大。

上方:兩條拋物線——反應物為灰色,產物為彩色——相交於一點,交點的高度就是能量位壘;產物曲線下移時,交點先降到基線,隨後又重新爬升。下方:電子轉移速率隨驅動力變化的曲線,先升到峰值再回落——這就是馬庫斯反轉區。

它在知識譜系裡的位置

馬庫斯的理論,補全了過渡態理論(艾林,1935)開啟的故事——後者解釋了重排原子的反應速率,卻管不了光禿禿的電子一跳。它借用了來自光譜學的法蘭克—康登思想:電子比原子核動得快得多;它一頭連著化學鍵的量子化學(鮑林),另一頭連著生命的氧化還原機器。休什得到了密切相關的結果,列維奇與多戈納澤則給出了量子版本。

The original document
Original source text
R. A. Marcus · J. Chem. Phys. 24(5), 966–978 · May 1956 · Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn
The problem
A large class of reactions in solution does nothing but pass an electron between two species — the exchange Fe²⁺ + Fe³⁺ → Fe³⁺ + Fe²⁺ is the type case — with no bonds made or broken. Transition-state theory, built for reactions that rearrange atoms along a single coordinate, gave no handle on them: why is one such electron exchange fast and another slow, when chemically nothing seems to happen?
A mechanism for electron transfer reactions is described, in which there is very little spatial overlap of the electronic orbitals of the two reacting molecules in the activated complex.
The slight-overlap mechanism
Because the electronic coupling is weak, the electron cannot simply hop whenever the partners collide: the solvent, polarized around the old charge distribution, would be left out of equilibrium with the new one, and energy would not be conserved (the Franck–Condon principle, applied to the nuclei). Marcus required instead that thermal fluctuations of the solvent polarization — and of the reactants' own bond lengths — first carry the system to a nuclear configuration in which the reactant and product electronic states have equal energy. Only there can the electron move at constant energy; the solvent then relaxes about the new charges.
Two parabolas and the reorganization energy
Treating the solvent as a dielectric continuum, Marcus showed that the free energy of the reactant state and of the product state are each, to a good approximation, a parabola in a collective reaction coordinate measuring the nonequilibrium polarization. The reaction proceeds through their intersection. The height of that intersection — the activation free energy — is fixed by just two quantities: the driving force ΔG° and the reorganization energy λ, the energy it would take to distort the reactants' nuclei and surrounding solvent into the products' equilibrium arrangement without moving the electron.
The result is compact — ΔG‡ = (λ + ΔG°)² / 4λ — and for the solvent contribution Marcus gave λ as a continuum expression in the reactant radii, their separation, and the optical and static dielectric constants of the medium.
[ … ]
The inverted region
The formula carries a startling consequence. As the reaction is made more favourable (−ΔG° rising from zero) the barrier falls — until, at −ΔG° = λ, it vanishes and the rate is greatest. Push further and the barrier returns: the rate now decreases as the driving force grows. This 'inverted region' was thought so implausible that it was doubted for some twenty-five years, until rigid donor–acceptor molecules confirmed it in 1984.
What followed
This was the first of a celebrated series running through the 1950s and 1960s, in which Marcus added the cross-relation linking a reaction's rate to its self-exchange rates. N. S. Hush reached closely related results; Levich and Dogonadze recast the theory quantum-mechanically; the experimental foundation came from Taube, Sutin, and others. The work brought Marcus the 1992 Nobel Prize in Chemistry.
Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn · 1956