JOVANA
Explore Library Glossary Getting Started Three Levels Fields How it works Mission
Join the mission
Back to the library
Physics 1957

Experimental Test of Parity Conservation in Beta Decay

C. S. Wu, E. Ambler, R. W. Hayward, D. D. Hoppes & R. P. Hudson

Cooled cobalt revealed that nature is not the same in a mirror — the weak force tells left from right.

Choose your version
In depth · the introduction

Everyone assumed the universe couldn't tell its left from its right. In 1957 a careful experiment proved it can.

The big idea

Parity is the idea that nature is mirror-symmetric — that any process, watched in a mirror, would still obey the same laws of physics. For most of physics this is true. But there is one of the four fundamental forces, the "weak" force behind certain kinds of radioactivity, where no one had ever actually checked.

Chien-Shiung Wu checked. She took cobalt-60, a radioactive metal whose atomic nuclei spin like tiny tops, lined those spins all up in the same direction, and watched which way the nuclei spat out electrons. The electrons came out preferentially in one direction relative to the spin — not evenly. A mirror image of the experiment would show them favouring the other direction. So the real world and its mirror reflection are distinguishable: nature does, after all, tell left from right.

How it came about

In 1956 particle physicists were stuck on a puzzle: two particles that seemed identical in every way appeared to decay into mirror-opposite final states. Two young theorists, Tsung-Dao Lee and Chen-Ning Yang, made a daring suggestion — perhaps the assumption everyone leaned on, that the weak force respects mirror symmetry, had simply never been tested.

They turned to Wu, the foremost beta-decay experimentalist of her day. She postponed a long-planned trip and joined forces with the low-temperature group at the National Bureau of Standards, who could chill her cobalt to within a few thousandths of a degree of absolute zero — cold enough to hold the spinning nuclei in line. By January 1957 the asymmetry was unmistakable, and the discovery stunned the physics world. That year's Nobel Prize went to Lee and Yang for the idea; Wu, whose experiment proved it, was not included — an omission still debated today.

Why it mattered

A symmetry that physicists had quietly trusted, on a par with the conservation of energy, turned out to be false for one of the basic forces. That forced a rewrite of how the weak force works, and fed directly into the modern, unified theory of the weak and electromagnetic forces. It also opened a deeper question: if the universe distinguishes left from right, what else about its apparent symmetry is only approximate?

A way to picture it

Imagine a spinning top that fires tiny pellets. If it shot them equally upward and downward along its axis, the scene would look the same in a mirror. Wu's cobalt nuclei were spinning tops that fired more pellets downward — against their spin — than upward. Now hold that up to a mirror: the reflection would show more pellets going up. The film and its mirror image no longer match, the way a real clock and its mirror image run their hands in opposite directions. That mismatch is parity violation.

An interactive beta-decay diagram: a cobalt nucleus with its spin arrow pointing up emits a lobe of electrons preferentially opposite the spin; a dashed lobe shows the mirror image pointing the other way. Sliders set nuclear alignment P and electron speed v/c, and the lobes become equal circles when alignment is zero.

Where it sits

Parity had stood alongside the conservation of energy and momentum as one of physics' unquestioned symmetries. Wu's experiment knocked it out for the weak force, much as later work would chip away at other symmetries — including the discovery of CP violation in 1964, which begins to explain why the universe is made of matter rather than antimatter. It belongs to the same twentieth-century story as Bell's later test of quantum reality: cherished assumptions about how the world must be, settled at last by experiment.

The original document
Original source text
C. S. Wu, E. Ambler, R. W. Hayward, D. D. Hoppes & R. P. Hudson · Physical Review 105 (1957): 1413–1415 · received January 15, 1957
The hypothesis under test
Months earlier, Lee and Yang had pointed out that parity — invariance under spatial inversion, the idea that nature does not distinguish left from right — had been verified for the strong and electromagnetic forces but never actually tested for the weak interaction responsible for beta decay. They proposed a direct test: align the spins of radioactive nuclei and ask whether the electrons come out symmetrically along and against that spin.
The experiment
Cobalt-60 was incorporated into a single crystal of cerium magnesium nitrate and cooled by adiabatic demagnetization to about 0.003 K, where a small magnetic field could line up the nuclear spins. The radioactive layer was kept extremely thin (~0.002 inch) so the beta electrons could escape, an anthracene scintillator counted them along the spin axis, and the anisotropy of the two emitted gamma rays measured how well the nuclei stayed aligned.
If an asymmetry in the distribution between θ and 180°−θ (where θ is the angle between the orientation of the parent nuclei and the momentum of the electrons) is observed, it provides unequivocal proof that parity is not conserved in beta decay.
The result
A pronounced asymmetry appeared: more electrons were emitted opposite to the nuclear spin than along it. As the crystal slowly warmed over about eighteen minutes and the alignment was lost, the asymmetry faded in step — its own built-in control. Parity is not conserved in the weak interaction.
[ … ]
National Bureau of Standards, Washington · received January 15, 1957