JOVANA
Library Glossary Getting Started Three Levels Fields How it works Mission
Join the mission
Back to the library
Earth Science 1912

The Origin of Continents and Oceans

Alfred Wegener

The continents fit together like the torn halves of a map — they were once one.

Choose your version
In depth · the introduction

Look at a world map: the eastern hump of South America fits the western dent of Africa like two pieces of a torn page. Wegener said that is no accident — they were once joined.

The idea, unpacked

Wegener proposed that the continents are not nailed in place. Long ago they were packed together into one giant landmass; since then they have slowly drifted apart to where they are now.

He didn't rest the case on the coastlines alone — that could be a fluke — but on the way the rocks and fossils on either side of the Atlantic continue each other, as if you had torn a printed page in two and found the sentences still running straight across the rip.

A meteorologist out of his lane

Wegener was a meteorologist and polar explorer, not a geologist. On 6 January 1912, in Frankfurt, he stood before the Geological Association and argued that continents move — and published the idea that same year. He spent the next two decades gathering evidence and expanding it into a book, The Origin of Continents and Oceans, through four editions. Most geologists rejected it: partly because he could not say what force could shove a continent across the globe, and partly because he was an outsider. He died in 1930 on the Greenland ice cap, still unvindicated.

Why it mattered

Wegener was right, and almost everyone else was wrong — a rare, clean case in science. He saw the single fact (the continents move) that ties together coastlines, mountain ranges, fossils and ancient climates, and he saw it forty years before anyone could explain how. When the explanation finally came — the seafloor itself spreads — it confirmed him and reorganized all of geology around moving plates. The ground under your feet is part of a slab gliding a few centimetres a year, about as fast as your fingernails grow.

The torn newspaper

Wegener's own image: imagine tearing a sheet of newspaper in two. You can tell whether two scraps were once joined not just by matching the ragged edges, but by checking whether the printed lines run straight across the tear. The coastlines are the ragged edges; the rock layers and fossil beds are the lines of print — and they line up.

Two landmasses — South America on the left, Africa on the right — separated by ocean. A slider drags Africa back across the Atlantic; their facing coastlines are drawn as one congruent torn edge, so they interlock as the gap closes. Three coloured bands marking matching mountain belts, the Glossopteris flora and the Mesosaurus reptile sit at the same latitudes on each margin, and connector lines bridge them as the seam shuts, so the bands run continuously across the join.

Before and after

The matching Atlantic coasts had been noticed for centuries — the mapmaker Abraham Ortelius suggested as early as 1596 that the Americas had been “torn away” from Europe and Africa — but the resemblance was waved away, or explained by land bridges that had conveniently sunk. After Wegener came the missing engine: in the 1960s, seafloor spreading and the magnetic stripes of the ocean floor turned “continental drift” into “plate tectonics”, the framework that now explains earthquakes, volcanoes and mountain ranges alike.

The original document
Original source text
Alfred Wegener (1880–1930) · first proposed in lectures and papers of 1912; developed in Die Entstehung der Kontinente und Ozeane (Vieweg, 1915; 4th ed. 1929)
The fit of the coasts
Wegener opens from a fact anyone can see on a globe: the Atlantic coastlines of South America and Africa run nearly parallel — the eastern bulge of Brazil matches the bight of the Gulf of Guinea. He insists this congruence is a clue to be tested, not a proof in itself.
It is just as if we were to refit the torn pieces of a newspaper by matching their edges and then check whether the lines of print run smoothly across. If they do, there is nothing left but to conclude that the pieces were in fact joined in this way.
(From the opening chapter, in John Biram's English translation of the fourth German edition.) The “lines of print” are the geological structures and fossils that must continue from one continent to the other if the two were once joined.
Pangaea
Reassembling the southern continents, Wegener reconstructs a single primeval landmass — in the 1920 edition he names it Pangaea, “all the Earth” — surrounded by one universal ocean, which begins to break apart from the Mesozoic onward as the fragments drift to their present places.
The lines of print: geology, fossils, climate
The evidence he assembles runs across the seam. Mountain belts and Precambrian shield rocks align on both Atlantic shores; the seed-fern Glossopteris is found across all the southern continents; Mesosaurus, a small freshwater reptile that could not cross an ocean, occurs only in Brazil and southern Africa. Late-Palaeozoic glacial deposits now lie in today's tropics while tropical coals lie near the poles — anomalies that resolve once the continents are reassembled around an ancient south-polar ice cap.
The unanswered question
Wegener proposed that the light continental blocks (which he called sial) drift through a denser substratum (sima), driven by a pole-fleeing force and by tidal attraction. He knew the forces he could name were weak, and conceded that the problem of the driving mechanism was still unsolved — the gap his critics would seize upon.
[ … ]
Marburg, 1912 — Greenland, 1930