JOVANA
Library Glossary Getting Started Three Levels Fields How it works Mission
Join the mission
Back to the library
Earth Science 1963

Magnetic Anomalies over Oceanic Ridges

Frederick J. Vine & Drummond H. Matthews

The sea floor is a magnetic tape recorder — and its symmetric stripes proved the continents move.

Choose your version
In depth · the introduction

The sea floor turns out to keep a diary — and the entries on the two sides of a mid-ocean ridge are mirror images, written by the Earth's flipping magnetic field.

The idea, unpacked

By 1963 some geologists suspected the ocean floor was spreading: new rock born at the mid-ocean ridges, sliding outward to either side. But how could you ever prove it? Vine and Matthews found the proof hidden in magnetism.

Now and then, over millions of years, the Earth's magnetic field flips — north and south swap. Molten rock erupting at a ridge cools and locks in whichever way the field is pointing at that moment, like a frozen compass. As the floor spreads, the rock carries that record outward. So the sea floor ends up striped: bands magnetised one way, then the other, then back — a tape recording of every flip. And because new rock is carried onto both sides at once, the stripes on the left must mirror the stripes on the right.

A PhD student, his supervisor, and a rejected rival

Fred Vine was a young PhD student at Cambridge; Drummond Matthews was his supervisor, who had brought back magnetic-survey data from a ship crossing the Carlsberg Ridge in the Indian Ocean. Vine saw what the stripes meant and, with Matthews, wrote it up in a short note for Nature. Unknown to them, a Canadian geophysicist named Lawrence Morley had hit on exactly the same idea — but his paper was rejected twice, one reviewer sniffing that it was the kind of thing to discuss at a cocktail party, not publish. The idea is now named for all three. At first even the experts were unconvinced; the real data were messy. The doubts vanished in 1966, when a survey ship's record across a Pacific ridge came back so perfectly symmetric that the argument was simply over.

Why it mattered

Half a century earlier, Wegener had argued the continents drift and was laughed out of the room because he could not say how. Hess had supplied a mechanism — a spreading sea floor — but it was still, in his own word, “geopoetry.” Vine and Matthews turned poetry into proof: a single prediction, the mirror symmetry of the stripes, that the ocean either showed or didn't. It did. That tipped the whole Earth-science community, and within a few years the modern theory of plate tectonics was built. Almost everything we now understand about earthquakes, volcanoes and mountains rests on that turn.

A barcode the planet printed itself

Think of the ridge as a label printer running in two directions at once, and the Earth's magnetic field as the ink that switches colour every so often. Each strip of fresh rock comes out stamped with the colour of the moment, then is pushed aside as the next strip prints. Read the barcode outward from the ridge and you read history backwards; lay the left side against the right and the two barcodes match line for line. That matching is the whole proof.

A mid-ocean ridge runs down the centre. Below it, magnetic stripes — dark for normal polarity, light for reversed — are laid down symmetrically on each side; above it, a wiggling magnetometer profile rises over normal stripes and falls over reversed ones. A slider sets the spreading rate, widening every stripe and peak; a button reflects the left-hand profile across the ridge onto the right, where it coincides, showing the mirror symmetry.

Before and after

Wegener (1912) said the continents move; Hess (1962) said the sea floor spreads to move them; the palaeomagnetists showed the field reverses. Vine and Matthews (1963), with Morley, tied those threads into a test the ocean passed. By 1968 the rigid-plate framework — plate tectonics — was complete, and the magnetic stripes had become the clock that dates every ocean basin. In the Library, this is the paper where seafloor spreading stopped being a beautiful guess and became measured fact.

The original document
Original source text
F. J. Vine & D. H. Matthews · “Magnetic Anomalies over Oceanic Ridges” · Nature 199 (4897): 947–949 · 7 September 1963 · doi:10.1038/199947a0
The puzzle: stripes on the sea floor
(Paraphrase.) The paper opens from a problem in the new magnetic surveys of the deep ocean. Towed magnetometers crossing the mid-ocean ridges record an anomaly in the total magnetic field that is not random but strongly lineated — long bands of higher-than-average and lower-than-average field running parallel to the ridge crest. Vine and Matthews work from a survey of the Carlsberg Ridge in the north-west Indian Ocean (and refer to the same pattern seen off the western coast of North America).
The hypothesis: a spreading floor that records reversals
(Paraphrase.) They combine two ideas already in the air. First, Hess and Dietz's seafloor spreading: new oceanic crust forms at the ridge crest and moves outward to either side. Second, the established fact that the Earth's magnetic field reverses its polarity from time to time. As molten rock solidifies at the ridge and cools through the Curie temperature, it locks in the direction of the field prevailing at that moment. If the floor then spreads, successive reversals must leave the crust divided into long blocks magnetised alternately in the normal and the reversed direction.
The consequence: the anomalies, and their symmetry
(Paraphrase.) Such alternating blocks would add to, or subtract from, the present field — producing exactly the pattern of parallel positive and negative anomalies that the surveys show, without any need for strips of unusually magnetic rock. The argument requires that a large fraction of the oceanic crust be reversely magnetised. And it makes a sharp prediction: because the blocks are carried away symmetrically on both limbs, the anomaly pattern must be a mirror image of itself across the ridge axis, with block widths set by the spreading rate and the spacing of reversals.
[ … ]
Madingley Rise, Cambridge · 1963