JOVANA
Explore Library Glossary Getting Started Three Levels Fields How it works Mission
Join the mission
Back to the library
Chemistry 1774

Experiments and Observations on Different Kinds of Air

Joseph Priestley

Air is not one thing: one part of it feeds every flame and every breath.

Choose your version
In depth · the introduction

Heat a pinch of red powder with sunlight, and out comes an invisible gas that makes a candle blaze and a mouse thrive — the gas we now call oxygen.

The big idea

For thousands of years people thought air was a single, simple thing — one of the four "elements." Joseph Priestley showed it is not. By heating a red powder (an oxide of mercury) with a lens that focused the sun, he captured a new kind of air in which a candle burned with a startlingly bright flame and mice lived far longer than usual.

That one component of ordinary air — about a fifth of it — is what fire and breathing both need. A flame and a lung, it turns out, are after the same thing.

How it came about

Priestley was a Dissenting minister and a tireless experimenter who had already bottled and described a whole menagerie of gases, and invented soda water along the way. On 1 August 1774, working at Calne in Wiltshire, he aimed his big burning lens at red oxide of mercury and was astonished by the flame the released air produced. Months later he plucked up the courage to breathe it, and joked that this "pure air" might one day become a fashionable luxury.

But Priestley explained his discovery with an old idea called phlogiston — a supposed fire-stuff — and got the story backwards. In Paris that October he described the experiment to Antoine Lavoisier, who saw what it really meant, named the gas oxygen, and built modern chemistry on it. A Swedish chemist, Carl Wilhelm Scheele, had quietly found the same gas even earlier. All three deserve a share; Lavoisier understood it best.

Why it mattered

Once you know that air is a mixture, and that one part of it drives both burning and breathing, the whole of chemistry opens up. You can explain rust and fire and why we breathe; you can weigh what a reaction takes in and gives off. Priestley's gas was the loose thread that, pulled, unravelled the ancient four-element view of the world.

A way to picture it

Think of air as a crowd in a room, only a fraction of whom are willing dance partners — that fraction is oxygen. A candle and a mouse are both looking for partners. In ordinary air they find enough. In Priestley's "dephlogisticated air" almost everyone will dance, so the flame roars and the mouse is full of energy. Seal them in a small room and let them use up the partners, and the dancing stops — the flame gutters out, the air goes stale.

Interactive bell jar: move a slider to change how much oxygen the sealed air holds; the candle flares or goes out and the mouse thrives or struggles, with markers for common air, the point where a candle dies, and near-pure oxygen.

Where it sits

Priestley stands at the doorway of modern chemistry. Behind him is the ancient idea of four elements; just ahead is Lavoisier weighing his way to the oxygen theory, and then Dalton's atoms and Mendeleev's periodic table, where oxygen takes its place as element number eight. His own discovery that plants renew air was an early glimpse of what we now call photosynthesis.

The original document
Original source text
Joseph Priestley · Experiments and Observations on Different Kinds of Air, Vol. II · London: J. Johnson, 1775
In the section "Of Dephlogisticated Air, and of the Constitution of the Atmosphere," Priestley opens by reflecting that his most important discovery owed less to design than to luck — a candour rare in scientific writing.
…more is owing to what we call chance, that is, philosophically speaking, to the observation of events arising from unknown causes, than to any proper design, or pre-conceived theory in this business.
The experiment of 1 August 1774
Using a large burning lens to focus sunlight on mercurius calcinatus per se — the red calx (oxide) of mercury — he drove off an "air" and collected it over mercury, away from the common atmosphere. (In modern terms, heat decomposes mercuric oxide into liquid mercury and oxygen.) Its first test was a candle flame:
But what surprized me more than I can well express, was, that a candle burned in this air with a remarkably vigorous flame, very much like that enlarged flame with which a candle burns in nitrous air, exposed to iron or liver of sulphur.
Breathing it
Months later he gauged the air's "goodness" with his nitrous-air test and found it several times better than common air; mice sealed in it outlived their fellows in ordinary air. At last he breathed it himself.
The feeling of it to my lungs was not sensibly different from that of common air; but I fancied that my breast felt peculiarly light and easy for some time afterwards. Who can tell but that, in time, this pure air may become a fashionable article in luxury.
Hitherto only two mice and myself have had the privilege of breathing it.
[ … ]
Priestley read all of this through the phlogiston theory: a flame or an animal, he supposed, fills the air with "phlogiston" until it can hold no more, so air emptied of phlogiston — "dephlogisticated" — supports both unusually well. He never gave up that framework. Carl Wilhelm Scheele had made the same gas in Sweden a few years earlier but published later; Antoine Lavoisier, told of the experiment in Paris, would soon reinterpret the gas correctly and name it oxygen.
Calne, Wiltshire · August 1774 (published 1775)