JOVANA
Library Glossary Getting Started Three Levels Fields How it works Mission
Join the mission
Back to the library
Mathematics 1918

Invariant Variational Problems

Emmy Noether

Behind every conservation law in physics stands a symmetry — and the reverse.

Choose your version
In depth · the introduction

There is a hidden reason energy can never be created or destroyed — and Emmy Noether is the one who found it.

The big idea

Physicists had long known a short list of “conservation laws”: in a closed system, energy, momentum and angular momentum never change their total. Noether proved these are not three separate accidents. Each one is the consequence of a symmetry — a way the laws of nature stay exactly the same when you shift something.

Because the laws of physics don't care what time it is, energy is conserved. Because they don't care where you are, momentum is conserved. Because they don't care which direction you face, angular momentum is conserved. Symmetry in, conservation law out — and, she proved, the reverse as well.

How it came about

In 1915 two of the greatest mathematicians alive, David Hilbert and Felix Klein, brought Noether to Göttingen. They were wrestling with Einstein's brand-new theory of gravity, in which energy seemed, disturbingly, to misbehave — and they needed her unmatched command of “invariants” to sort it out. Noether did better than sort it out: she found the general law lying underneath.

She did this while being denied the ordinary rights of a scholar. As a woman she could not hold a paid professorship; she had been lecturing under Hilbert's own name. When colleagues objected to giving her a position, Hilbert is said to have snapped that the university senate “is not a bathhouse.” She finally earned the formal right to teach in 1919 — the year after this paper appeared.

Why it mattered

Before Noether, conservation laws were treasured facts discovered by experiment. After her, they were predictions: name a symmetry of nature, and she could tell you exactly what must be conserved. That flipped physics on its head — symmetry became the master tool for building new theories, which is precisely how the Standard Model of particle physics was later constructed.

A way to picture it

Think of a perfectly round dinner plate. Spin it on the table and it looks identical — that sameness is rotational symmetry. Now press a dent into one edge: spin it again and you can tell it moved. The round plate “conserves” its appearance under rotation; the dented one does not. Noether's theorem says nature works the same way: wherever the rules look identical after a change, something stays exactly constant — and the moment you dent the symmetry, that something begins to drift.

An interactive orbit: a particle moves in a bowl-shaped potential drawn as a dashed equipotential. With the symmetry-breaking slider at zero the equipotential is a circle and the angular-momentum reading stays constant; as you slide it up the equipotential stretches into an ellipse and the angular-momentum reading swings up and down, while the energy reading never changes.

Where it sits

Noether stands at the hinge of modern physics. The symmetries that organize Maxwell's electromagnetism, Einstein's relativity, and the Higgs field — all elsewhere in this Library — become conservation laws through her theorem. A century later, “what symmetry protects this quantity?” is among the first questions a physicist asks of any new idea.

The original document
Original source text
Emmy Noether · Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Math.-phys. Klasse (1918): 235–257 · presented by F. Klein, 26 July 1918
The problem
Noether studies variational integrals I = ∫ L dx that are left unchanged by a continuous group of transformations (in the sense of Lie), and asks what follows for the associated Euler–Lagrange equations. Two theorems give the most general answer: one for finite groups (a fixed number of constant parameters), one for infinite groups whose transformations contain arbitrary functions.
Theorem I
If the integral I is invariant with respect to a G_ρ, then ρ linearly independent combinations of the Lagrange expressions become divergences — and from this, conversely, invariance of I with respect to a G_ρ will follow. The theorem holds good even in the limiting case of infinitely many parameters.
A divergence that vanishes is a conservation law: each of the ρ parameters of a finite symmetry group yields one conserved quantity — energy from invariance in time, momentum from invariance in space, angular momentum from invariance under rotation.
Theorem II
If the integral I is invariant with respect to a G_∞ρ in which the arbitrary functions occur up to the σ-th derivative, then there subsist ρ identity relationships between the Lagrange expressions and their derivatives up to the σ-th order. Here also the converse holds.
For symmetries that depend on arbitrary functions — the local, or “gauge,” symmetries, of which the general covariance of Einstein's gravitation is the great example — the field equations are no longer independent; they satisfy identities. The associated “conservation laws” become consequences of those identities: precisely the “improper” energy theorems Hilbert had noticed in general relativity.
[ … ]
The paper closes by noting that this is exactly the situation in Einstein's theory of gravitation, clarifying the assertions of Hilbert and Klein about the special status of the energy law there — the question that had brought Noether to the problem in the first place.
Göttingen · 1918