JOVANA
Explore Library Glossary Getting Started Three Levels Fields How it works Mission
Join the mission
Back to the library
Genetics 1910

Sex Limited Inheritance in Drosophila

Thomas Hunt Morgan

One white-eyed fly pinned a gene to a chromosome — heredity became a thing you could map.

Choose your version
In depth · the introduction

A single fly born with the wrong eye colour turned heredity from an abstract rulebook into a map you could actually draw.

The big idea

Gregor Mendel had shown that traits are passed on as discrete “factors,” but no one knew where those factors lived. Morgan found out — by accident. Among thousands of red-eyed fruit flies, one male turned up with white eyes, and the way that white colour was inherited only made sense if its factor was riding on one particular chromosome: the X, the same one that helps decide whether a fly is male or female.

Because of how the X is passed down, a son gets his only copy from his mother. So a recessive trait hidden on the X can skip the daughters and surface in the grandsons — which is exactly the strange pattern Morgan saw. The gene was no longer a bookkeeping symbol; it had a physical home.

How it came about

The setting was a cramped, banana-scented lab at Columbia University that everyone called the “fly room.” Morgan was actually a sceptic — he doubted both Mendel's factors and the idea that chromosomes carried heredity, and he bred flies partly hoping to test those claims. Then, in 1910, the lone white-eyed male appeared. Morgan and his collaborators — including his wife, the biologist Lilian Vaughan Morgan, and a brilliant set of students — bred it, counted its descendants, and read the pattern. The sceptic became the chromosome theory's greatest champion.

Why it mattered

This was the experiment that gave genes an address. It welded together two ideas that had been circling each other — Mendel's invisible factors and the chromosomes biologists could actually see down a microscope — and turned genetics into a science of locations and maps. It also explained, for the first time, why certain human conditions like colour blindness and haemophilia run from mothers to sons while sparing the daughters.

A way to picture it

Think of each chromosome as a particular shelf in a library, and a gene as a book on that shelf. The white-eye book sits on the X shelf. A daughter inherits two X shelves, one from each parent, so a single white-eye book is easily outvoted by a normal one. But a son inherits just one X shelf — and only from his mother. If her shelf carries the white-eye book and nothing overrules it, he reads white. Use the cross tool below and swap which parent is white-eyed; watch the offspring pattern flip.

A cross diagram with two buttons for the parental direction. Three rows — parents, children, grandchildren — show female and male flies with red or white eyes, so you can see white disappear and return depending on which parent carried it.

Where it sits

Morgan's fly stands midway in a great chain. Mendel (1866) had found the rules of inheritance without knowing the carrier; Morgan placed those rules onto chromosomes; and four decades later Avery (1944) and then Watson and Crick (1953) revealed what the carrier is actually made of — DNA. The genetic maps that began in the fly room run unbroken to today's Human Genome Project.

The original document
Original source text
T. H. Morgan · Science, new series, 32 (812): 120–122 · July 22, 1910
The paper opens not with a theory but with an accident — a single fly that should not have looked the way it did:
In a pedigree culture of Drosophila which had been running for nearly a year through a considerable number of generations, a male appeared with white eyes.
The crosses
Morgan bred the white-eyed male to its red-eyed sisters. The entire first generation (F₁) had the ordinary brilliant red eyes — white had vanished, behaving as a simple recessive. He then let the red-eyed F₁ flies interbreed.
In the second generation (F₂) white reappeared — but with a twist no autosomal factor could produce. Morgan's tally was 2459 red-eyed females, 1011 red-eyed males, and 782 white-eyed males. Not one white-eyed female appeared. (The white flies fell short of a clean 3 : 1 ratio because, as Morgan noted, white-eyed individuals were the weaker and died off more often.)
[ … ]
The explanation
Morgan proposed that the factor for red eye-colour is carried together with the factor that determines sex — what he wrote as “X.” A daughter receives an X from each parent; a son receives his single X only from his mother, and a Y from his father. The white factor, riding on the X, therefore could not reach a son except through his mother — which is exactly why white eyes surfaced only in F₂ males.
The reciprocal cross sealed it. Mate a red-eyed male to a white-eyed female and the result inverts: every F₁ daughter is red and every F₁ son is white — the “criss-cross” of a trait passing from mother to son. Ordinary Mendelian characters give identical results whichever parent carries them; a character that does not is one tied to the sex chromosome.
T. H. Morgan · Columbia University, New York · 1910