JOVANA
Explore Library Glossary Getting Started Three Levels Fields How it works Mission
Join the mission
Back to the library
Physics 1850

On the Mechanical Equivalent of Heat

James Prescott Joule

Heat is a form of energy — and here is its exact exchange rate with work.

Choose your version
In depth · the introduction

For years, a wealthy brewer's son spent his evenings dropping weights into buckets of water and reading the thermometer to a hundredth of a degree — and so proved that heat is not a thing, but a form of energy.

The big idea

Before Joule, scientists thought heat was an invisible fluid called “caloric” that you could pour from a hot object into a cold one but never make or destroy. Joule showed they were wrong. Heat is a form of energy — the same energy a moving weight or a turning wheel carries — and you can turn one into the other at a fixed rate.

He measured that rate. A certain amount of mechanical work, every single time, makes exactly the same amount of heat. That fixed “exchange rate” between work and heat is what let energy be counted — and it led to one of the deepest rules in all of science: energy is never created or destroyed, only changed from one form into another.

How it came about

James Joule ran his family's brewery in Manchester and did science as a serious hobby, in a home laboratory, paying for it himself. With no university post, he was at first brushed aside by professional physicists. His one great tool was care: he could measure temperature changes far smaller than anyone else of his day.

His most famous experiment used a falling weight to spin a paddle wheel inside a sealed can of water; the stirring warmed the water by a tiny, measurable amount. The story goes that on his Alpine honeymoon he tried to measure the temperature difference between the top and bottom of a waterfall — whether or not that tale is exactly true, it captures the obsession. When he reported his results in 1849, it was the young William Thomson — the future Lord Kelvin — who saw their importance and helped win him a hearing.

Why it mattered

Joule turned a vague idea — that “force” is never lost — into a hard number, and with it the law of conservation of energy. That law is one of the load-bearing walls of physics: every engine, power plant, battery and living cell obeys it. His measurement also corrected Carnot's earlier engine theory, which had wrongly assumed heat was a conserved fluid; together their work became the science of thermodynamics. The unit of energy is now called the joule in his honour.

A way to picture it

Think of work and heat as two currencies — say dollars and euros. Caloric theory said you had a fixed pile of “heat-coins” that only ever moved around. Joule showed instead that you can mint heat-coins out of work, and there is a fixed exchange rate: so many turns of the paddle always buy exactly the same warmth. Once you know the rate, you can keep perfect books — and the total, counted in either currency, never changes.

An interactive model of Joule's paddle-wheel experiment: a falling weight turns a paddle that stirs water. Three sliders set the weight, the height of the fall and the number of falls. More work warms the water more — but the ratio of work to heat, the mechanical equivalent, stays the same however you set the sliders.

Where it sits

Joule's work sits at the hinge of nineteenth-century physics. It overturned the caloric theory that underlay Carnot's engine analysis (1824) and supplied the experimental basis for the first law of thermodynamics; Clausius (1865) would soon add the second law and entropy. Read alongside Carnot in this Library, the two together explain both how much work heat can do and why some is always lost. The principle of energy conservation Joule helped establish runs through everything after — Helmholtz's physiology, Maxwell's electromagnetism (1865), and the energy bookkeeping of every modern climate and engine model.

The original document
Original source text
J. P. Joule · On the Mechanical Equivalent of Heat · Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 140, 61–82 · read 1849, published 1850
Joule opens by recalling his earlier experiments — on magneto-electricity, on the compression of air, on water forced through narrow tubes — each of which had pointed to the same equivalence between mechanical power and heat. Here he sets out to fix that equivalent with exactness.
The apparatus
A pair of lead weights, wound up on a drum, descends through a measured height and turns a brass paddle wheel sealed inside a copper can of water; fixed vanes break up the flow so the water cannot simply spin with the paddles, forcing them to do real work against fluid friction. The weights fall slowly; their loss of height is read off, the water's faint rise in temperature taken on a sensitive thermometer, and every stray gain or loss of heat corrected for.
[ … ]
The result
From a long series of experiments — with water, with mercury, and with cast-iron friction plates — Joule draws two conclusions:
1st. That the quantity of heat produced by the friction of bodies, whether solid or liquid, is always proportional to the quantity of force expended.
2nd. That the quantity of heat capable of increasing the temperature of a pound of water (weighed in vacuo, and taken at between 55° and 60°) by 1° Fahr. requires for its evolution the expenditure of a mechanical force represented by the fall of 772 lb. through the space of one foot.
[ … ]
In modern units, 772 ft·lbf to warm a pound of water by one degree Fahrenheit is a mechanical equivalent of about 4.16 joules per calorie — within one percent of the value accepted today.
J. P. Joule · Manchester · 1850