JOVANA
Explore Library Glossary Getting Started Three Levels Fields How it works Mission
Join the mission
Back to the library
Physics 1922

On the Curvature of Space

Alexander Friedmann

The universe need not stand still: Einstein's own equations let space expand — or expand and fall back.

Choose your version
In depth · the introduction

Einstein had quietly assumed the universe just sits there, the same forever. A young Russian opened the same equations and found they say something far stranger — the whole cosmos can grow.

The big idea

When Einstein finished general relativity, he applied it to the whole universe and got an answer he disliked: the cosmos wanted to move. To keep it still — as everyone then assumed it must be — he added a fudge factor, the ‘cosmological constant’, tuned to hold space frozen. Alexander Friedmann, a mathematician and meteorologist in Petrograd, simply asked: what if we don't force it to be still?

Solving the equations without that assumption, he found not one universe but a family of them, all changing in time. Some expand forever. One expands, slows, stops, and then falls back together — what he called the ‘periodic world’. Which fate a universe meets depends on a single thing: how much matter it contains. Pack in enough, and gravity eventually reverses the expansion; too little, and it grows without end.

How it came about

Friedmann was not an astronomer chasing the sky; he was a brilliant applied mathematician who had flown reconnaissance and computed bombing tables in the First World War. Reading the new relativity, he saw a freedom others had missed and published his expanding solutions in 1922.

The reaction was humbling, then vindicating. Einstein himself read the paper and rejected it, printing a note that said Friedmann had made a mistake. Friedmann wrote back with his calculations laid out line by line. A year later Einstein published a retraction: the error, he admitted, had been his own, and Friedmann's results were correct. Tragically, Friedmann died of typhoid in 1925 at just thirty-seven — four years before Edwin Hubble looked through a telescope and saw distant galaxies actually flying apart, exactly the moving universe Friedmann had found on paper.

Why it mattered

This is the moment the universe got a history. Before Friedmann, ‘the cosmos’ meant a fixed, eternal stage. After him, it became a thing with a past and a future — something that could have begun, that is changing now, and that will end in one of a few definite ways. Rewind any expanding solution and everything rushes together to a single instant: the seed of the Big Bang. Every modern map of cosmic history — the afterglow of that beginning, the forging of the first elements, the fate billions of years hence — is read off the equations Friedmann wrote.

A way to picture it

Throw a ball straight up. Whether it falls back depends entirely on how fast you threw it against how strong gravity is. Throw it gently and it rises, stops, and comes down — that's the ‘periodic’ universe, expansion reversed into a collapse. Throw it at escape velocity or faster and it never returns — that's a universe that expands forever. The amount of matter in the cosmos plays the role of gravity's strength, deciding which throw you've made. In the tool below, dial the density and watch the universe's whole life draw itself out, either climbing away forever or arcing over and crashing back.

A graph of the size of the universe over time. A slider sets how much matter the universe holds; low settings give a line that rises forever, high settings give a line that rises to a peak and falls back to zero at a point labelled Big Crunch, with a dot marking today.

Where it sits

Friedmann's equations grew straight out of Einstein's 1915 general relativity, but turned its picture of the cosmos upside down. Five years later, Georges Lemaître independently rediscovered the expanding solution and added the physical idea of a ‘primeval atom’ — the universe born from a single dense point. Edwin Hubble's 1929 measurement (in this Library) supplied the missing evidence. Together their names live on in the FLRW model that all of cosmology still uses, and the thread runs on to the collapsing stars of Oppenheimer and Snyder (1939) and the dark energy that now governs the universe's future.

The original document
Original source text
A. Friedmann · Zeitschrift für Physik 10, 377–386 (1922) · received 29 June 1922
The starting assumptions
Friedmann takes Einstein's field equations of general relativity and asks for cosmological solutions under two simple postulates: that matter is, on the large scale, uniform and at rest (a pressureless ‘dust’), and that space has the same constant curvature everywhere — homogeneous and isotropic. Crucially, he does NOT assume the universe is static. Where Einstein and de Sitter had each found one unchanging model, Friedmann lets the radius of curvature of space be a function of time, R(t), and solves for how it must evolve.
Three kinds of world
The equations admit a whole family of non-static universes, which Friedmann sorts into types. In the ‘monotonic’ worlds the radius of curvature grows without bound — the universe expands forever, in one case starting from zero size. In another solution the radius oscillates: space swells to a maximum and then contracts again.
The radius of curvature varies between 0 and x₀. We shall call this universe the periodic world.
What he could and could not yet say
Friedmann computed the period of such an oscillating world and noted that the cosmological constant Λ could be positive, negative, or zero, giving different histories. He made no claim that the real universe is one of these models — he had no data on cosmic expansion; he established only that Einstein's equations permit a universe that moves. Observational confirmation (Hubble's redshift–distance law) and the physical ‘primeval atom’ reading came later, from others.
[ … ]
The full derivation — the field equations under the symmetry assumptions, the classification of solutions, and the period of the periodic world — is at the source below, in the German original and in English translation.
Petrograd · received June 29, 1922 · Zeitschrift für Physik