JOVANA
Explore Library Glossary Getting Started Three Levels Fields How it works Mission
Join the mission
Back to the library
Chemistry 1935

The Activated Complex in Chemical Reactions

Henry Eyring

Every reaction must climb to a fleeting summit — and that one barrier sets its speed.

Choose your version
In depth · the introduction

Why is one reaction over in a heartbeat and another takes a thousand years? Eyring found the answer in a single instant that every reaction must pass through.

The idea, unpacked

For a reaction to happen, the starting molecules cannot simply slide into the products. They must first be pushed 'uphill' into a strained, half-made and half-broken arrangement — like a ball that has to be lifted over a hill before it can roll down the far side. Eyring named that fleeting peak arrangement the activated complex, and made a daring move: treat it as if it were an ordinary molecule, momentarily in balance with the reactants.

Once you do that, the speed of the whole reaction comes from two things: how many molecules, at any instant, have enough energy to sit at the top — set by the height of the hill, the activation energy — and how fast those summit arrangements tip over into products. The second number turned out, astonishingly, to be universal: the same for every reaction, a frequency k_BT/h fixed by nothing but the temperature.

Where it came from

In the early 1930s Henry Eyring, an American chemist at Princeton, had been mapping the 'energy landscape' a reaction travels across. With Michael Polanyi he had drawn one of the first such surfaces, for the simplest reaction of all — a hydrogen atom meeting a hydrogen molecule. In a 1935 paper in the Journal of Chemical Physics he turned that picture into a general recipe for speed. The story goes that he finished writing it in a hospital bed, recovering from a car crash on the road back to Princeton.

At almost the same moment, in Manchester, Meredith Evans and that same Michael Polanyi published the same idea in thermodynamic dress; the result is sometimes called the Eyring–Polanyi equation. Curiously, though it reshaped all of chemical kinetics, it never won a Nobel Prize.

Why it mattered

Before Eyring, chemists could measure how fast a reaction went and fit it to Arrhenius's 1889 formula — but the formula's 'pre-factor' was just a number pulled from the data. Eyring gave it a meaning, and in principle a way to calculate a reaction's speed from the shapes and energies of molecules alone. He also split the barrier into an enthalpy part (energy) and an entropy part (how much order the summit demands) — two dials chemists still read off every mechanism today.

An everyday analogy

Think of a mountain pass between two valleys. To cross from one to the other you don't tunnel through the mountain — you climb to the lowest notch in the ridge, the pass, and drop down the far side. A reaction is the same: the activated complex is the pass, the activation energy is its height, and the colder the day (the lower the temperature) the fewer travellers have the energy to reach it, so the slower the crossing. Slide the controls below to raise or lower the pass and feel how violently the traffic responds.

Top: a reaction-coordinate energy diagram — flat at the reactants, rising to a peak marked ΔG‡ (the transition state), then dropping to the lower products; raising the ΔG‡ slider lifts the peak. Bottom: a curve of log₁₀ of the rate constant k against temperature T, climbing from left to right, with a dot at the current temperature; raising the barrier slides the whole curve downward.

Where it sits

Eyring's theory completed a line that began with Arrhenius (1889), who first wrote rate as an exponential of an activation energy, and it set the stage for what came after. Marcus's theory of electron transfer (1956) is transition-state thinking adapted to the jump of a single electron; the modern picture of how enzymes work — by stabilizing exactly this fleeting summit — descends straight from it. And to know the energy landscape in the first place, it leans on the quantum chemistry of the chemical bond (Pauling).

The original document
Original source text
H. Eyring · J. Chem. Phys. 3(2), 107–115 · February 1935 · Princeton University (submitted November 1934)
The problem
Arrhenius had shown in 1889 that a rate constant obeys k = A·exp(−E_a/RT): reaction speeds rise steeply with temperature, governed by an activation energy E_a. But the pre-exponential factor A was an empirical number, read off the data, with no theory behind it — and there was no way to compute a rate from the molecules themselves.
Abstract (as published)
The calculation of absolute reaction rates is formulated in terms of quantities which are available from the potential surfaces which can be constructed at the present time. The probability of the activated state is calculated using ordinary statistical mechanics. This probability multiplied by the rate of decomposition gives the specific rate of reaction. The occurrence of quantized vibrations in the activated complex, in degrees of freedom which are unquantized in the original molecules, leads to relative reaction rates for isotopes quite different from the rates predicted using simple kinetic theory.
The activated complex
A reaction traces a path across a potential-energy surface and must cross its lowest pass — a saddle point. The configuration sitting on that col is the activated complex. Eyring treated it as an ordinary molecule, fully in equilibrium with the reactants, with one exception: of its internal degrees of freedom, the motion along the reaction coordinate is not a bound vibration but a loose translation that carries the system over the top toward products.
Its concentration then follows from ordinary statistical mechanics — an equilibrium constant built from molecular partition functions. The rate is that concentration multiplied by the frequency with which each complex falls apart. When the reaction-coordinate mode is separated out of the partition function as a free translation over a small length, that frequency collapses to a single universal quantity, k_BT/h ≈ 6.2×10¹² s⁻¹ at room temperature — the same for every reaction.
[ … ]
The master equation
The result can be written k = κ (k_BT/h)(Q‡/Q_AQ_B) exp(−E₀/RT) in terms of partition functions, or in thermodynamic dress as k = κ (k_BT/h) exp(−ΔG‡/RT) = κ (k_BT/h) exp(ΔS‡/R) exp(−ΔH‡/RT). The transmission coefficient κ (≤ 1) accounts for complexes that slip back; ΔH‡ and ΔS‡ are the enthalpy and entropy of activation.
What followed
Working independently in Manchester, M. G. Evans and Michael Polanyi published the same thermodynamic formulation in 1935 (Trans. Faraday Soc. 31, 875); the equation is often the Eyring–Polanyi equation. Wigner gave it a rigorous dynamical footing in 1938, clarifying that the theory yields an upper bound on the rate. The 1941 textbook of Glasstone, Laidler and Eyring, The Theory of Rate Processes, carried it into general use.
Princeton, New Jersey · 1934–1935