JOVANA
Library Glossary Getting Started Three Levels Fields How it works Mission
Join the mission
Back to the library
Physics 1932

The Existence of a Neutron

James Chadwick

A neutral particle as heavy as the proton hides inside every nucleus.

Choose your version
In depth · the introduction

A strange radiation could fling protons out of wax, yet carried no electric charge at all — and explaining it forced physicists to admit a brand-new particle hiding in the heart of every atom.

The big idea

By 1920 the atom had a tiny, heavy, positive nucleus (Rutherford) circled by electrons. But the nucleus weighed about twice what its protons alone could account for, and no one knew why. James Chadwick found the missing piece: a particle with almost exactly a proton's mass but no electric charge — the neutron. Every nucleus is a tight pack of protons and neutrons.

Because it is electrically neutral, the neutron is the key that turns. Carrying no charge, it is not pushed back by a nucleus, so it can slip right in — which is exactly why neutrons, only a few years later, would be the tool used to split the atom.

How it came about

For over a decade Chadwick and his mentor Ernest Rutherford had suspected a neutral particle existed; Rutherford had even predicted it in a 1920 lecture. The decisive clues came from abroad. In Germany, Bothe and Becker noticed that beryllium hit by α-particles gave off a mysterious, very penetrating radiation. In Paris, Irène and Frédéric Joliot-Curie found that this radiation could knock protons out of paraffin wax — but explained it as a kind of ultra-energetic light, a γ-ray.

Chadwick read their paper and knew at once that light could not do this: a massless γ-ray flinging a heavy proton at that speed would need an absurd amount of energy. In a few intense weeks at the Cavendish Laboratory in early 1932, he measured how the radiation kicked not only hydrogen but nitrogen and other gases, and showed the numbers only made sense if it were a particle as heavy as a proton. He had found the neutron.

Why it mattered

The neutron completed the picture of the atom and at once explained isotopes — why the same element can come in slightly heavier and lighter versions (they simply carry different numbers of neutrons). And because it has no charge, the neutron became the perfect probe for reaching into the nucleus. Within seven years it had been used to discover nuclear fission; within thirteen, that discovery had built both reactors and the atomic bomb. Few single particles have changed history so quickly.

A way to picture it

Think of an invisible cue ball on a darkened pool table. You can't see the cue ball, but you can see the coloured balls it scatters. If it strikes a light ball (a proton) and then a heavy one (a nitrogen nucleus), and you measure how fast each flies off, you can work backward to the cue ball's weight — without ever seeing it. Chadwick's chargeless, invisible neutron was the cue ball; the recoiling protons and nitrogen nuclei were the coloured balls that gave its mass away.

Interactive recoil experiment: a slider sets the assumed mass of an invisible neutral radiation and a toggle aims it at a hydrogen or a nitrogen nucleus; the struck nucleus recoils. Matching how hard both are kicked works only for a mass close to that of a proton — the neutron. A toggle also shows why a γ-ray would need an impossible amount of energy.

Where it sits

This is the direct sequel to Rutherford's 1911 discovery of the nucleus — the particle Rutherford himself had guessed at in 1920. It set the stage for Fermi's 1934 theory of the weak force (which governs how a lone neutron decays) and for all the nuclear physics that followed. Its strangest children are the neutron stars — entire stellar cores crushed into a ball of neutrons — proposed just two years later and seen, as pulsars, in 1967.

The original document
Original source text
J. Chadwick · 'Possible Existence of a Neutron' · Nature 129 (1932): 312 · received 17 February 1932
The letter opens with a puzzle others had left behind. Bothe and Becker (1930) had found that beryllium, struck by polonium α-particles, gives off a very penetrating neutral radiation; the Joliot-Curies (1932) showed that this radiation could eject protons from paraffin with velocities up to nearly 3×10⁹ cm per second — but read it, as everyone did, as high-energy γ-rays.
Why the γ-ray reading fails
Chadwick objects that a massless γ-ray flinging so fast a proton would need an energy near 50 MeV — far more than the few MeV the beryllium reaction can release — and that the same photon cannot also account for the recoils he measures in nitrogen and other gases. Conservation of energy and momentum, taken together, rule the photon out:
Up to the present, all the evidence is in favour of the neutron, while the quantum hypothesis can only be upheld if the conservation of energy and momentum is relinquished at some point.
A neutral particle of mass one
The difficulties disappear, however, if it be assumed that the radiation consists of particles of mass 1 and charge 0, or neutrons.
Treating the radiation as such a particle in elastic collision, and comparing the maximum recoils it gives to hydrogen and to nitrogen, Chadwick solves for its mass and brackets it between 1.005 and 1.008 mass units — essentially the proton's. He identifies it with the neutral particle Rutherford had predicted in 1920, the missing second constituent of the nucleus.
[ … ]
Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge · 17 February 1932