JOVANA
Library Glossary Getting Started Three Levels Fields How it works Mission
Join the mission
Back to the library
Chemistry 1858

Sketch of a Course of Chemical Philosophy

Stanislao Cannizzaro

To weigh an atom, take the least of that element ever found in a molecule.

Choose your version
In depth · the introduction

For thirty years chemists agreed atoms existed — and could not agree how much any of them weighed. One Sicilian fixed it with a single rule applied without flinching.

Take the smallest, every time

Cannizzaro's idea is almost stubbornly simple. You can never weigh a single atom. But you can weigh molecules — by an old trick of Avogadro's, the density of a gas tells you the weight of its molecules. So gather many different molecules that all contain, say, carbon, and ask how much carbon each one carries.

The amounts come out as a tidy series: 12, 24, 12, 72, 12… always whole-number multiples of 12, and never less than 12. The smallest amount that ever shows up — the lump that never splits — is one atom. Its weight is the atomic weight. Do this for every element and the whole confused table snaps into order.

A revolutionary, then a teacher

Stanislao Cannizzaro was a Sicilian who had fought in the failed 1848 revolution and fled into exile before settling, finally, into a chemistry professorship at Genoa. In 1858 he wrote out, as a letter to a friend, the way he taught the subject — and it contained the cure for chemistry's worst headache.

Almost nobody noticed at first. The fix came two years later, at Karlsruhe in 1860, the first great international gathering of chemists, called precisely because the field could no longer agree on its own formulas. As the meeting broke up, copies of Cannizzaro's pamphlet were handed out at the door. One young chemist, Lothar Meyer, said reading it felt as if scales fell from his eyes; another delegate, Dmitri Mendeleev, carried its atomic weights home and, nine years later, used them to build the periodic table.

Why it mattered

Without agreed atomic weights, chemistry could not become quantitative. The same compound was written different ways by different people; reactions could not be reliably balanced; there was no way to line the elements up and look for pattern. Cannizzaro gave the field one consistent ruler. Everything that needs to count atoms — every balanced equation, every dose, every recipe in a factory — stands on the weights he straightened out.

Weighing coins you may never touch

Imagine sealed bags of identical coins. You may never open a bag, but you can weigh each whole bag. Bag after bag comes in at 12, 24, 12, 72 grams — always a multiple of 12, never less. You would rightly conclude that a single coin weighs 12 grams, even though you never held one. Cannizzaro's molecules are the bags; the atoms are the coins; the scale is Avogadro's hypothesis.

Choose carbon, oxygen, hydrogen, nitrogen or chlorine. Each compound of that element is drawn as a bar showing how much of the element sits in one molecule. As you reveal more compounds, the smallest bar — the atom — is highlighted, and that is the atomic weight.

Its place in the story

Cannizzaro completes a chain: Dalton gave chemistry atoms (see dalton-1808), Avogadro gave it a way to count them (see avogadro-1811), and Cannizzaro made the counting consistent. The straightened weights flowed straight into Mendeleev's periodic table (see mendeleev-1869), where ordering the elements by atomic weight suddenly revealed a repeating pattern that no wrong table could have shown.

The original document
Original source text
Stanislao Cannizzaro · Il Nuovo Cimento 7, 321–366 · 1858 · a letter to S. de Luca · English: Alembic Club Reprints No. 18
A course, not a treatise
The work is cast as a long letter to his friend Sebastiano de Luca, laying out the order in which Cannizzaro taught chemistry to his students at Genoa. Its argument is pedagogical: lead the reader, step by step, to a single consistent way of weighing atoms and molecules.
The one rule, applied without exception
He begins by reinstating the half-forgotten hypothesis of Avogadro and Ampère — equal volumes of any gas, at the same temperature and pressure, contain equal numbers of molecules — and insists it be applied to every gas, with none of the special pleading that had grown up around it. With that, the density of a vapour measured against hydrogen yields its molecular weight at once.
From molecular weights and chemical analysis he reads off, for each element, the mass it contributes to a long series of compounds. The decisive observation: those masses are always whole-number multiples of one least quantity. That least quantity — never subdivided in any reaction — he calls the atom, and its value is the atomic weight.
[ … ]
Setting the weights straight
Carried through, the rule corrects a generation of errors. Carbon comes out at 12, not the 6 then in common use; the doubled and halved weights of the metals are pinned down by checking against Dulong and Petit's law of specific heats. The result is the first table of atomic weights that does not contradict itself — the document Cannizzaro's friends pressed into delegates' hands as they left Karlsruhe in 1860.
Genoa · 1858 / Karlsruhe · 1860