JOVANA
Explore Library Glossary Getting Started Three Levels Fields How it works Mission
Join the mission
All guides

Putting It to Work: Reactions, Decays and Beyond the Standard Model

Turn the whole picture into problem-solving power — decide which reactions nature allows and compute a real decay — then look squarely at the questions the Standard Model cannot answer.

Bookkeeping a reaction: is it allowed?

The everyday work of a particle physicist starts with a simple question: can this reaction happen at all? You answer it not by solving equations but by checking the conserved quantities one by one. If any is violated, the reaction is forbidden, full stop.

  1. Check electric charge Q — it must be equal before and after. This is exact, always.
  2. Check baryon number B — count +\tfrac13 per quark, -\tfrac13 per antiquark (so $+1$ per baryon, $-1$ per antibaryon, $0$ for leptons and bosons).
  3. Check lepton number L — $+1$ per lepton, $-1$ per antilepton, $0$ for quarks and bosons. (In the Standard Model each generation's lepton number balances separately.)
  4. Check energy — a spontaneous decay needs the parent's rest mass to exceed the total rest mass of the products. If the parent is lighter, the decay cannot proceed at rest.
  5. If every quantity balances, the reaction is allowed — though which force mediates it (strong, EM or weak) still sets how fast it goes.

Two quick tests. Is p \to e^+ + \gamma allowed? Charge balances ($+1 = +1$) and energy is fine, but baryon number does not: 1 \to 0. Forbidden — which is precisely why the proton is stable and you are still here. Now neutron beta decay n \to p + e^- + \bar\nu_e: charge $0=+1-1$, baryon $1=1$, lepton $0 = +1-1$, and the neutron is heavier than the proton. Allowed — and indeed a free neutron decays with a lifetime of about 15 minutes.

Decay kinematics with four-momentum

Once a decay is allowed, how much energy do the products carry? The tool is conservation of the four-momentum — energy and momentum together. For a parent of mass M at rest decaying to two products, momentum conservation forces the two to fly apart back-to-back, and the energy-momentum relation then pins down each energy uniquely.

E_1 = \frac{M^2 + m_1^2 - m_2^2}{2M} \qquad (c=1)

The energy of product 1 in a two-body decay of a parent of mass M at rest, from four-momentum conservation.

Take the real decay \pi^+ \to \mu^+ + \nu_\mu, the dominant way a charged pion dies. Using m_\pi \approx 139.6 MeV, m_\mu \approx 105.7 MeV and a massless neutrino, plug into the formula (in natural units):

E_\mu = \frac{m_\pi^2 + m_\mu^2}{2m_\pi} \approx 109.8\ \text{MeV}, \qquad p = \frac{m_\pi^2 - m_\mu^2}{2m_\pi} \approx 29.8\ \text{MeV}

The muon's energy and the shared momentum. The neutrino carries E_\nu = p \approx 29.8 MeV, and E_\mu + E_\nu = 139.6 MeV = m_\pi — energy checks out.

Cracks in the Standard Model

For all its precision, the Standard Model is not the final word — and it tells you so itself. Start with the neutrinos. The original model assumed them massless, yet neutrino oscillation — neutrinos changing flavour in flight — has been observed, and oscillation is impossible unless neutrinos have (tiny) mass. The two-flavour probability makes the point:

P(\nu_\alpha \to \nu_\beta) = \sin^2(2\theta)\,\sin^2\!\left(\frac{\Delta m^2\,L}{4E}\right)

The oscillation probability depends on the mass-squared difference \Delta m^2 — so a non-zero oscillation is direct proof that neutrino masses differ, hence are not all zero.

The gaps widen from there. Dark matter — five-sixths of the universe's matter, needed to explain galaxy rotation curves — has no particle anywhere in the Standard Model. The matter-antimatter asymmetry cannot be produced by the model's meagre CP violation. And the hierarchy problem asks why the Higgs mass (\sim100 GeV) is so absurdly smaller than the Planck scale (\sim 10^{19} GeV) when quantum corrections seem to want to drag it upward — a fine-tuning so extreme it feels like a clue.

Where this leads: unification and quantum gravity

These cracks point beyond the model. The strengths of the three forces change with energy, and they very nearly converge around 10^{16} GeV — the hope of a grand unified theory in which electromagnetism, the weak and the strong force are three faces of one interaction. Supersymmetry, pairing every fermion with a boson partner, could stabilize the Higgs mass, sharpen that convergence, and even supply a dark-matter candidate — though the LHC has so far found no superpartners, tightening the theory's room.

The deepest gap of all is gravity. The Standard Model simply leaves it out, and general relativity resists being made quantum. Reaching the Planck scale — where a full theory of quantum gravity must take over — is the frontier that ideas like string theory attempt, replacing point particles with tiny vibrating strings so that gravity and the quantum forces might finally share one framework.