the scientific method
The scientific method is the disciplined way we decide what is actually true about nature, rather than just what we would like to be true or what sounds convincing. Its heart is simple: propose an explanation, then test it against reality, and let the evidence, not authority or intuition, have the final word.
In its usual cycle you observe something, ask a question, and form a hypothesis (a testable proposed explanation). From the hypothesis you deduce a prediction, then run an experiment or make measurements to check it, controlling other variables so the test is fair. If the data disagree, the hypothesis is wrong and must be revised or discarded; if they agree, confidence grows but the idea is never proven beyond all doubt, only supported so far. A hypothesis that survives many independent, repeatable tests and unifies wide ranges of observation may become a theory (in science, a well-tested framework, not a mere guess) or a law (a concise, reliable relationship).
The two features that give science its power are testability and reproducibility: a claim must be able, in principle, to be proven wrong (falsifiable), and others must be able to repeat the test and get the same result. This is why physics insists on stated uncertainties and controlled experiments; they are what let evidence genuinely settle disputes.
Galileo's claim that all objects fall at the same rate (ignoring air) is scientific because it is testable: drop a coin and a feather in a vacuum tube and they land together. A claim that could never be checked would not be science.
A scientific claim must be testable, and able to fail the test.
In everyday speech a 'theory' means a hunch, but in science a theory is among the most well-supported things we have, like the theory of gravity. Do not confuse the two meanings.