relativity of simultaneity
Two events that happen 'at the same time' for one observer can happen at clearly different times for another who is moving relative to the first. There is no single, universal 'now' stretching across the cosmos; each observer slices up time a little differently. This is the deepest and most unsettling idea in special relativity, and the root from which time dilation and length contraction grow.
The reason traces directly to the constancy of light. To call two distant events simultaneous, you must compare them using signals, and light is the fastest, most even-handed signal we have. But two observers in relative motion disagree about how those light signals reach the midpoint, so they honestly disagree about which event came first. Neither is mistaken; they are using the same rules and getting different answers.
Imagine a train car with a lamp at its exact centre. A passenger sees the flash reach the front and back walls together, because for her the light travels equal distances at equal speed. To someone standing on the platform, the car is moving, so the rear wall rushes toward the light while the front wall flees from it. The platform observer sees the back lit first. Same flashes, two truthful but different orderings.
Crucially, the relativity of simultaneity only ever scrambles the order of events that are too far apart for light to travel between them. Events linked by cause and effect always keep their order for every observer, so the past never becomes the future. Relativity bends our notion of 'now' without ever letting an effect outrun its cause.
Two events simultaneous in one frame (Δt = 0) but separated in space (Δx ≠ 0) are not simultaneous in a moving frame.
Simultaneity is relative only for spacelike-separated events. The order of cause and effect (timelike-separated events) is absolute, protecting causality.