robot autonomy
Autonomy is how much a robot can get a job done on its own, without a person stepping in to steer it. A highly autonomous robot decides for itself how to handle whatever it meets; a low-autonomy one waits for a human to tell it nearly every move. Think of two ways to get somewhere: drive the car yourself, holding the wheel the whole time, versus tell a taxi the address and let it figure out the route. Both reach the destination; only one runs without your constant input.
Autonomy is not all-or-nothing — it is a dial, not a switch. The same robot can be more autonomous at easy parts of a task and lean on a human for the hard or risky parts. A warehouse robot might navigate aisles entirely by itself but call a person when a package is jammed; a surgical robot may hold perfectly steady on its own while a surgeon makes every cut. What matters is who is making the decisions, moment to moment, and how often a human must intervene.
More autonomy is not automatically better; it is a trade-off. Autonomy lets a robot work in places people cannot easily reach, far away or underwater or in danger, and frees humans from dull or exhausting supervision. But it also demands that the robot handle surprises safely on its own, which is genuinely hard, so designers grant only as much autonomy as the robot can be trusted to use well.
A Mars rover is highly autonomous out of necessity: radio signals take minutes to arrive, so it must drive itself around rocks without waiting for Earth to react.
When help is too far away to wait for, autonomy stops being a luxury.
Autonomy is measured along a graded scale rather than as a single yes-or-no label; see levels of autonomy.