reconciliation of net income to operating cash flow
Two friends split a flat. At month-end one says, 'On paper we should have 5,000 left,' but the jar of cash holds only 3,200. To make sense of the gap they walk through it line by line: 'We billed a flatmate 1,000 who hasn't paid — that's why; and we set aside 200 for the broken-down fridge but haven't spent it.' That walk-through, turning the on-paper figure into the real cash figure and explaining every difference, is a reconciliation.
In accounting, reconciling net income to operating cash flow is the bridge that explains why a company's profit (net income, computed on an accrual basis) does not equal the cash its operations actually produced. Starting from net income, you add back non-cash expenses (depreciation, amortization), remove non-operating gains and losses, and adjust for changes in current assets and current liabilities (receivables, inventory, payables). Each line is a reason the two numbers differ; when you finish, you have arrived at operating cash flow.
This reconciliation is the heart of the indirect method, and it is required disclosure even for companies that present operating cash using the direct method. Its real value is diagnostic: it lets a reader see whether profit is backed by cash or is being inflated by, say, sales that customers are slow to pay. A widening gap — strong profit but weak cash — is one of the classic early warning signs that accountants and analysts watch for.
Net income 40,000; add depreciation 25,000; add loss on equipment sale 3,000; subtract increase in inventory 10,000; add increase in accounts payable 12,000 = operating cash flow 70,000. Each adjustment explains a slice of the 30,000 gap between profit and cash.
Every line is a named reason profit and cash disagree.
A rise in a current asset (more receivables or inventory) reduces cash; a rise in a current liability (more payables) increases cash. The signs feel backwards at first and are the most common place beginners slip.