effective nuclear charge
/ Z-eff (Z with subscript eff) /
Imagine standing near a powerful heater, but with several people huddled between you and it. You feel warmth, but not the full blast — the others absorb some of it. The effective nuclear charge, written Zeff, is the net positive pull an electron actually feels from the nucleus after the other electrons have soaked up part of it. It is the real, reduced charge that does the work of holding that electron in place.
The rule of thumb is simple: Zeff = Z - S, where Z is the actual number of protons (the full nuclear charge) and S is the screening or shielding constant, an estimate of how much the other electrons cancel out. For sodium's outer electron, Z is 11 but S is roughly 8.8, so Zeff is only about 2.2. The inner core electrons do most of the shielding; electrons in the same shell shield only weakly. Slater's rules are a recipe for estimating S, and hence Zeff, with pencil and paper. Across a period, you add protons (Z up by 1 each step) but the new electrons go into the same shell and shield each other poorly — so Zeff climbs steadily left to right.
Effective nuclear charge is the single quantity that explains the periodic trends. A higher Zeff pulls the electron cloud in tighter, so atoms shrink across a period; it makes electrons harder to remove, so ionization energy rises; it makes atoms grab electrons more eagerly, so electronegativity rises. Down a group Zeff rises only modestly while the electrons sit in much larger shells, so size grows and the outer electrons loosen. Keep in mind it is an approximation — a single average number standing in for a complicated many-electron reality — but a remarkably powerful one.
Across period 2 the outer-electron Zeff rises from about +1.3 (Li) to +3.1 (C) to +4.5 (F) by Slater's estimate — which is why atoms shrink and ionization energy climbs left to right.
Same shell, more protons, weak mutual shielding = rising Zeff.
Zeff is a model number, not something you can measure directly, and different recipes (Slater's rules vs. quantum calculations) give somewhat different values. Use it to explain trends, not to claim a precise charge.