income elasticity of demand
/ YED /
When people get richer, they don't just buy more of everything in equal measure — they buy a lot more of some things, slightly more of others, and actually less of a few. Income elasticity of demand measures this: how much the quantity demanded of a good changes when buyers' incomes change. It captures how a product's fortunes ride the rising or falling tide of household budgets, which is why it matters enormously to anyone planning what to sell as a country grows.
It's the percentage change in quantity demanded divided by the percentage change in income. The sign and size tell a story. If the number is positive, the good is normal — people buy more of it as they earn more. Among normal goods, if income elasticity is greater than 1 (a 10 percent income rise lifts demand by, say, 25 percent), it's a luxury, whose demand grows faster than income — restaurant meals, holidays, designer clothes. If it's between 0 and 1, it's a necessity, whose demand grows but more slowly than income — bread, basic clothing. And if the number is negative, the good is inferior: as income rises, people buy less of it, trading up to something better — think bus travel giving way to cars, or instant noodles giving way to fresh food.
Businesses and governments lean on income elasticity to see the future. A firm selling luxuries booms in good times and suffers badly in recessions, while a seller of necessities is steadier through the cycle. As whole economies grow, demand shifts predictably away from inferior and basic goods toward luxuries and services — which is part of why rich countries spend so much more on travel, dining, and entertainment than poor ones. The usual caveat applies: whether a good is a luxury, necessity, or inferior depends on the person and the income level — a bicycle is a luxury for a poor household and may be inferior for a rich one.
As a country's incomes double, demand for overseas holidays might quadruple (a luxury, income elasticity above 1), demand for salt barely moves (a necessity, near 0), and demand for cheap instant noodles falls (an inferior good, negative).
Luxury (>1), necessity (0 to 1), inferior (<0) — income elasticity sorts goods by how they ride income.
Don't confuse income elasticity (response to income) with price elasticity (response to price) — they answer different questions and can point opposite ways for the same good. "Luxury" and "necessity" here are technical labels about income response, not value judgments about importance.