electrochemical series
If you line every half-reaction up in order of its standard reduction potential, from the most electron-hungry at the top to the most electron-giving at the bottom, you get a single league table of redox power. That ranked list is the electrochemical series. It turns the whole sprawl of redox chemistry into something you can read like a leaderboard: who beats whom.
The rule for reading it is simple and powerful. Any species high in the table (high, positive potential — a strong oxidizing agent like F2 or MnO4-) will oxidize anything lower down; equivalently, any species low in the table (low, negative potential — a strong reducing agent like Li, K, or Zn) will reduce anything higher up. A more familiar cousin, the activity series of metals, is just the metals' slice of this same list, which is why a more reactive metal (zinc) displaces a less reactive one (copper) from solution, and why metals above hydrogen react with acids to release H2 while those below (copper, silver, gold) do not.
This one ordered list quietly explains a vast amount of everyday chemistry: which metals corrode, which protect others as sacrificial anodes, why you can store copper sulfate in an iron-free container but not an iron one, and which displacement reactions will run. The honest caveat is that the series predicts only the thermodynamic direction under standard conditions. Reaction speed is a separate matter (aluminium sits high yet seems unreactive thanks to its oxide layer), and shifting concentration or pH can reorder close-lying couples, as the Nernst equation makes explicit.
Zn (E° = -0.76 V) sits below Cu (E° = +0.34 V) in reducing power ranking, so a zinc strip dropped into copper sulfate gets coated with copper as Zn displaces Cu2+.
A metal displaces from solution any metal ion lower in reducing power.
It ranks thermodynamic tendency, not speed, and only at standard conditions. The metal activity series and the electrochemical series are the same idea; do not treat them as separate rules.