absolute error
Absolute error is the plain, no-frills distance between an approximation and the true value: if x is the true value and x~ is your computed approximation, the absolute error is |x~ - x|. It answers the simple question 'how far off am I, in the same units as the quantity itself?' A length predicted as 5.03 metres when the truth is 5.00 metres has an absolute error of 0.03 metres.
Because it carries the units and the scale of the quantity, absolute error is exactly what you want when there is a natural tolerance in those units — 'the part must be within 0.1 mm', 'stop iterating when the change is below 1e-8'. For a vector or function you measure it with a norm, for example ||x~ - x||_2 (the Euclidean length of the error vector) or a max norm (the largest single component error). In an iterative method, the change between successive iterates, |x_{n+1} - x_n|, is a cheap practical stand-in for the true absolute error you cannot see.
Absolute error has one blind spot: it does not know whether the quantity is big or small. An error of 0.03 is tiny next to a true value of a million but catastrophic next to a true value of 0.001. That is precisely why relative error exists, scaling the error by the size of the answer. Use absolute error when the natural scale is fixed and known; reach for relative error when the magnitudes span many orders, as floating-point numbers do.
Approximating pi by 22/7 = 3.142857... against pi = 3.141592...: the absolute error is |3.142857 - 3.141592| = 0.001264, about 1.3 thousandths, expressed in the same (dimensionless) units as pi itself.
Distance to the truth in the quantity's own units — simple, but blind to scale.
Absolute error alone can mislead: 0.001 is excellent for a value near a million and dreadful for a value near 0.001. Always ask whether the scale is fixed before choosing absolute over relative error.