binding site prediction
Binding site prediction asks the computer to look at a protein's surface and point out where a small molecule could plausibly bind, the way you might scan a climbing wall to spot the handholds before you start climbing. The surface of a protein is mostly featureless, but a few clefts and pockets are where drugs are likely to grip.
Methods to find these pockets fall into a few groups. Geometric approaches hunt for concave cavities of the right size and shape on the surface. Energy-based approaches probe the surface with small chemical fragments to see where they bind favorably, mapping out hot regions. Knowledge-based and machine-learning approaches learn what real binding sites look like from databases of known protein-ligand complexes and predict similar features on new proteins.
This matters because before any docking or structure-based design can begin, you must know where to aim, and the most druggable pocket is not always the protein's obvious active site. Predicted pockets can also reveal allosteric sites suitable for modulators. The honest caveat is that proteins are flexible: a cryptic pocket that is closed in the static structure may open only upon ligand binding, so some real sites are missed and some predicted ones never form.
Cryptic and allosteric pockets are the frontier here: some of the most valuable druggable sites do not exist in the resting structure and only appear transiently, which static prediction can easily overlook.