Inverse problem (source estimation)
The EEG/MEG inverse problem is the estimation of the neural sources that produced an observed set of sensor signals. It is fundamentally ill-posed: Helmholtz showed in the nineteenth century that a given exterior field can be produced by infinitely many interior source configurations, so the mapping from data to sources is non-unique. It is also ill-conditioned (small measurement noise can produce large errors in the estimate) and underdetermined (far more candidate sources than sensors).
Because the data alone cannot select a solution, every inverse method must impose additional assumptions — priors or constraints — to obtain a unique, stable estimate. These range from parametric assumptions (a small number of point dipoles) to distributed priors (minimum energy, spatial smoothness, sparsity) to spatial-filtering formulations (beamformers). The choice of prior, not the data, largely determines the character of the solution, so an inverse result must always be interpreted in light of its assumptions.
Two very different source maps fitting the same data equally well is not a bug to be fixed but a mathematical fact. The honest reading of any inverse solution is 「this is the source configuration consistent with the data and my chosen prior」, not 「this is where the activity was」.